This means the company may have ignored and avoided Black neighborhoods when offering mortgage loans—and that’s a serious problem.
🕵️ What Did the DOJ Find?
The lawsuit says Fairway didn’t treat everyone equally. Here’s what they’re being accused of:
-
No loan officers placed in Black neighborhoods
-
No marketing in majority-Black areas
-
Low loan numbers for Black homebuyers—even though other lenders did better
-
Branch locations that skipped entire ZIP codes with mostly Black residents
Basically, Fairway’s business choices made it harder for Black families to get home loans, even when they were qualified.
🗣️ A Word from the DOJ
“Fairway’s practices effectively shut the door of homeownership on communities of color in Birmingham.”
– U.S. Attorney Prim F. Escalona
That’s a strong statement—and it shows how seriously the government is taking this case.
⚖️ What Happens Next?
This case is still in court. Fairway hasn’t admitted to any wrongdoing, and there’s no settlement—yet. But if the court finds them guilty, they could face millions of dollars in penalties, new rules, and be required to do better in serving Black communities.
💡 Why It Matters
This is the first major redlining lawsuit in Birmingham in decades. It proves that housing discrimination isn’t just a thing of the past. It still happens today—and not just through denials, but by not showing up at all.
Even companies that don’t openly say “no” to Black homebuyers can still create unfair systems through neglect, bias, and business decisions.
📺 Want to learn more about how housing discrimination still affects our communities?
Subscribe to The Constructive House on YouTube for more real-life case files, breakdowns, and tools to protect your homeownership journey.
👉 Don’t just buy a home—understand the system behind it.
#Redlining #FairHousing #MortgageDiscrimination #TheConstructiveHouse #HousingJustice #DOJ #Birmingham #ModernRedlining #FairwayMortgage #HomeownershipEquity #CivilRightsHousing
Comments
Post a Comment